Supplier Dependency and Relationship Risk: FOSROC Chemicals India Pvt Ltd
FOSROC Chemicals India Pvt Ltd's available supplier record shows 29.96% dependency on Keshun International Ltd. That level sits below the 30% concentration threshold used in this review, so the record does not trigger a single-supplier failure warning. However, the Trial relationship label and 0.03 loyalty score do not support a strategic partnership; they are more consistent with a trial-stage or transactional relationship.
Recorded dependency and concentration risk
The recorded dependency on Keshun International Ltd is 29.96%. This is the only supplier-concentration metric supplied for this brief. Under the 30% threshold applied here, the figure is below the level that would automatically raise a single point of failure concern. In practical terms, the available record does not show extreme reliance on one supplier.
This is a positive diversification signal within the covered transactions, but it is not proof of enterprise-wide resilience or verified alternative sourcing. The data indicate that the observed dependency is not high enough to call this a single-source failure risk in this review.
Relationship profile: transaction-oriented, not strategic
| Indicator | Recorded value | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Dependency on Keshun International Ltd | 29.96% | Below the 30% single-supplier concentration flag used in this review |
| Cooperation length label | Trial | Trial-stage classification, not a stated number of months or years |
| Loyalty score | 0.03 | Low recorded score; scoring scale not supplied |
The relationship is labelled Trial in the cooperation length field. Because this is a category label rather than a time period, it should not be read as months or years of trading history. The 0.03 loyalty score is also low on the available record, but the scoring scale is not defined, so the value cannot be converted into a percentage, credit rating, or contractual strength.
Together, these two indicators are more consistent with a transactional or trial relationship than with a strategic partnership. They do not demonstrate long-term commitment or supplier integration.
Due diligence implications
- Treat the 29.96% dependency as a positive concentration signal, but verify the actual share of spend or volume it represents and whether alternative suppliers are qualified and available.
- Confirm the real contract term, performance history, delivery record, and service levels before relying on Keshun International Ltd for supply continuity.
- Clarify the loyalty score methodology: a 0.03 value has limited risk interpretation without the scoring scale, weighting factors, and update date.
- Review whether the Trial label reflects a new engagement, a pilot order, or a short-term purchasing arrangement rather than an established relationship.
Data notes
This brief uses only the provided dependency percentage (29.96%), cooperation length label (Trial), and loyalty score (0.03). No transaction volumes, contract terms, scoring methodology, or updated operational data were supplied. The 30% threshold is a descriptive review benchmark, not a legal or industry standard. This page was automatically generated from the available trade information.
