ROYAL BORDER S.A. DE C.V. Supplier Profile: 13.06% Dependency and Transactional Relationship Signals

Key finding

The supplied dependency indicator shows a 13.06% reliance on ROYAL BORDER S.A. DE C.V. as a single supplier. That falls below the 30% reference point used in this review and is not in the 80% single-point-of-failure zone. A cautious reading is that concentration exposure to this supplier is limited in the covered records.

Even so, the 13.06% figure should not be upgraded into a claim of proven supply-chain resilience or complete diversification. It only tells us that the observed dependency is relatively moderate, not that alternative suppliers are contracted, qualified, or available.

Relationship assessment

The relationship classification is more consistent with a transactional relationship than with a strategic partnership. The cooperation length is recorded only as “Trial,” and the loyalty score is 0.00. Taken together, these signals do not show a long-term or high-commitment pattern. The Trial value is a category label, not a dated length of service, and the loyalty score should not be read as a percentage or credit rating because its scoring scale is not stated.

From a risk perspective, the limited dependency lowers the near-term concentration exposure, but the weak relationship evidence means due-diligence teams do not yet have support for treating ROYAL BORDER S.A. DE C.V. as a secure strategic supplier.

What this means for due diligence

For supplier due diligence, these indicators should be used as a screening starting point, not as proof of supplier stability. Teams should verify:

• what the 13.06% figure covers — purchase value, order count, weight, or another measure — before comparing it across suppliers;
• actual contract duration and renewal terms, since the Trial label does not establish months, years, or a committed multi-year arrangement;
• whether the 0.00 loyalty score comes from a relevant internal model or a third-party scoring system, and what the scale means;
• whether qualified alternative suppliers are available, and whether moving volume would require new qualification or create price and lead-time trade-offs.

Data notes

This page was automatically generated from the available trade information. The analysis is based on a 13.06% single-supplier dependency figure, a Trial cooperation classification, and a 0.00 loyalty score. The measurement base for the dependency percentage and the loyalty scoring scale were not provided, so the conclusion is limited to the direction and relationship signals in those supplied indicators. It does not confirm contract status, overall supply-chain resilience, or supplier reliability.